OWS: Change it in 2012!

December 14, 2011 6:36 am 1 comment

Opinion – Berlin, November 22, 2011 - What began as a small gathering of anarchists, bored youngsters, and aging hippies in early September has grown into a worldwide protest movement against everything but the redistribution of wealth: Occupy Wall Street. While it is true that the United States has seen growing social inequalities, falling wages, and a transformation into an active welfare state since the 1980s, this is not a conspiracy of government and Wall Street. It is rather a result of Main Street’s failure to organize effectively and engage the political sphere. After decades of low voter turnout, people suddenly realize that they have no say in decisions. But hey: if you don’t vote, don’t complain about the outcomes! The American system in particular offers numerous opportunities to participate, intervene or contact one’s representative and thus get heard in the decision making process.

While the basic idea of the Occupy Wall Street movement might in some respects be legitimate (working five jobs to make ends meet is not the real deal; government bailouts for banks and corporations must not become the rule), however, the OWS folks will not achieve much with their current modus operandi. First of all, a relative majority of Americans (45% in a recent Public Policy Polling poll) opposes the movement, so claiming to be “the 99%” is pretty misleading. Moreover, according to Gallup, more than six in ten Americans do not really know what OWS is all about, and hence have no idea what they should think about it. The most interesting fact of these polls, however, is that Democrats are overrepresented in the samples, so basically they are not more supportive of the movement than Republicans.

But why is the Occupy movement losing its support? The most obvious answer is that it has never had much support to begin with and it was inflated by early media coverage. Thanks to more objective reporting on the movement,  including social and economic explanations behind the rise of the movement, many Americans may have made up their mind and now tell pollsters what they (do not) like about OWS. A second answer might be last week’s unsuccessful “Day of Action”, when protesters tried to literally “Occupy Wall Street”, but in fact were not even able to get near the New York Stock Exchange. This day has shown that the movement has few clues when it comes to achieving or explaining what they are actually protesting for. While asking to stop government-financed bank bailouts, they also demand student loans and private consumer debts to be bailed out. Anyone else see a contradiction here?! A second point is their protest against banks “taking away homes”. Apparently the protesters forget that many of the so-called 99% had gratefully taken (risky) loans to buy homes, even though they had (or should have) realized that they could hardly repay them. Furthermore, even though they claim to be hit hardest by the current economic situation, most of the protesters actually do have a job and rather prefer to redistribute the wealth in favor of “poor people”, to which they count themselves.

Another important aspect not to be overlooked is that the Occupy Movement is a rather heterogeneous group, of which OWS is only one part and not a national phenomenon. In New York City people might call for tougher regulation of Wall Street, but in other cities across the U.S., protestors have their own agenda, tailored to their specific regional problems: Occupy Oakland focuses more on the perceived unfair treatment of port workers, whereas the more recent “Occupy Infrastructure” organizes itself around the demand of renewing infrastructure in their counties, thereby creating (much-needed) jobs.

Even though the United States has some serious economic – and maybe political – problems, camping and protesting in private-public-spaces, such as Zuccotti Park, does not change much. If the Occupy Wall Street movement actually wanted to change something about “corporate greed”, economic inequality or the excess of banks, they should participate in the political process, rather than continue to bash those who work hard. The 2012 elections might be a worthy start.

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–

Gerrit Kettel is a graduate student at Freie University Berlin and he is involved on the YTCA Berlin Committee.

1 Comment

  • Good, one thing we miss, is those students were also free to take those student loans out. When I was in college, there were student loans, but very few people took them. We saved our money, , we looked for scholarships, including ROTC, we worked part time (some people worked full time), but most of us did not get into debt, because nothing is guaranteed.

    Today students take out loans, and don’t think of the ability to repay them. There is a cooking school here in Houston, and I understand that when you finish, you may owe the school $45,000. Now does that really match what someone will earn as a chef? We just need a good dose of reality before we take out loans.

Leave a Reply


Trackbacks

Other News

  • Christian Persecution World Russia Declares ‘Holy War’ On Islamic State

    Russia Declares ‘Holy War’ On Islamic State

    The Orthodox Christian Church, which is reclaiming its traditional role in post-Soviet Russia, has just described its government’s fight against the Islamic State and other jihadi groups in Syria as a “holy war.”

    According to Vsevolod Chaplin, head of the Church’s Public Affairs Department,

    The fight with terrorism is a holy battle and today our country is perhaps the most active force in the world fighting it. The Russian Federation has made a responsible decision on the use of armed forces to defend the People of Syria from the sorrows caused by the arbitrariness of terrorists. Christians are suffering in the region with the kidnapping of clerics and the destruction of churches. Muslims are suffering no less.

    This is not a pretext to justify intervention in Syria.

    Read more →
  • 2nd Amendment Faith Oregon Shooting – When Tragedy Happens Let’s Focus On The Cause And Not The Tools Used

    Oregon Shooting – When Tragedy Happens Let’s Focus On The Cause And Not The Tools Used

    While the blood was still dripping from those martyrs who, in front of an evil man armed with a gun, asked them if they were Christians and those strong in the faith said they were. He shot them in the head. While those who were lost or weak said nothing he spared their lives and shot them in their legs.

    Barrack Hussein Obama angrily ran to the cameras to use this opportunity to say that guns being in the hands of the law-abiding Americans is the problem, and we need to restrict the 2nd amendment to spare the lives of “we the people.”

    This is nuts; guns do not kill people, people kill people! You can test this fact in your own home right now. (Do not worry no one will get hurt).

    Read more →
  • 2nd Amendment Faith Gun Free Zones Are Killing Zones

    Gun Free Zones Are Killing Zones

    How did you feel when you heard of the shootings in Oregon this week? Was the first thing that came to your mind the thought that if we only had stricter gun control legislation, this kind of tragedy could have been prevented?

    If you listened to idiotic liberals, like President Barack “Insane” Obama, you might believe that. It is my contention that liberalism is a mental disorder based on the rejection of God and His principles, and extreme irresponsibility.

    Read more →
  • National Where’s the Beef, in Republican candidates, in 2015?

    Where’s the Beef, in Republican candidates, in 2015?

    What type of Republican Leader do you want in 2015?

    As we look at elections coming up quickly in 2015, as well as the very important 2016 election cycle, what type of “Republican” leaders do you want to shape the future of your county and country?

    Do you ever wonder why it is that the current crop of Republicans are not declaring, at every media interview, “These ills have been brought to you by the Democrat Party!” when speaking of Obamacare, the hordes of immigrants being allowed to destroy our country, the Iranian nuclear treaty, the “Black Lives Matter” racial division rhetoric, the attack on the defense of marriage, the 94 million Americans not currently in the work force,

    Read more →
  • National Child protection services Sentences Baby To Death ON 9/11/2015

    Child protection services Sentences Baby To Death ON 9/11/2015

    Child protection services should be self-explanatory based on the simplicity of its name. But they are doing exactly opposite of their name in many places. Wynne, Arkansas is one such place.

    A baby has been sentenced to death and will be executed on Friday, September 11, 2015 and Arkansas Department of HUMAN SERVICES (DHS) – Division of Children and Family Services- Central Office will facilitate the delivery of the baby’s 10-year-old to the abortion clinic.

    On August 29, 2015 20-year-old Justin Smith was arrested and charged with three counts of rape and one count of endangering the welfare of a minor. His “alleged” victim is a 10-year-old.

    Read more →