Obama And Ron Paul Playing Footsies With Iran

January 14, 2012 12:28 pm 0 comments

Just look at the dangerous situation Obama has created; and if elected, Ron Paul would advocate for the same thing.

Obama ran on a platform of having “nice” conversations with the Iranian rulers; and when elected, Obama immediately apologized to Iran for America’s “imagined wrongs.” This signaled to the Iranians that Obama would be a weak President and that it would be “open season” on America.

Now Iran has brought our drown down by spoofing its GPS system; Obama refused to allow our military to blow up the drone; and Iran is taking the drone apart piece by piece to capture our remote-control signals and communication mechanisms used by our U. S. control center.

On 1.1.12, Iran announced it had produced its first nuclear fuel rod, a feat of engineering which could lead to the production of nuclear weapons.

On 1.2.12, Iran began testing its surface-to-surface cruise missile in international waters near the Strait of Hormuz.

When Obama decided to threaten Iran with sanctions against its central bank, Iran said they may close the Strait of Hormuz, keeping one-fifth of the world’s oil supply from being shipped from the Persian Gulf countries to the rest of the world.

On 1.8.12 Iran reported that they have begun uranium enrichment at a bunker-like facility that is shielded from airstrikes by 300 feet of mountain rock.

Associated Press – Iran reportedly begins uranium enrichment at underground site amid threats

TEHRAN, Iran – Iran has begun uranium enrichment at a new underground site built to withstand possible airstrikes, a leading hard-line newspaper reported Sunday in another show of defiance against Western pressure to rein in Tehran’s nuclear program.

The operations at the bunker-like facility south of Tehran, reported by the Kayhan daily newspaper, are small in comparison to Iran’s main enrichment site. But the centrifuges at the underground labs are considered more efficient and are shielded from aerial surveillance and protected against airstrikes by up to 300 feet (90 metres) of mountain rock.

Uranium enrichment is at the core of the international standoff over Iran’s nuclear program. The U.S. and its allies fear Iran could use its enrichment facilities to develop high-grade nuclear material for warheads.”

What is the Obama administration’s response to this very disturbing news? They are telling Israel absolutely not to take any unilateral military action against Iran’s nuclear program.  I wonder if Obama (or Ron Paul) would feel any differently if Mexico or Canada had nuclear weapons on their borders targeted at the United States.

Bottomline:  Obama and Ron Paul are two of a kind. They are pretending that the Iranian danger does not exist. If Ron Paul had been in Obama’s seat, Ron Paul would have said, “Iran, you just do whatever you want to do because Israel is not our problem. In fact, Iran, you deserve to have a nuclear weapons program of your own so that you can stand up to Israel.  We in America will not step in and do anything to help Israel because we have financial worries of our own.

Were Iran to place a drone with nuclear capabilities right over Washington, D. C., I wonder what Obama and Ron Paul would do then.

Another very disturbing development is that the Obama administration (with Ron Paul’s support) has recently announced to the entire world that America will no longer be able to fight two sustained ground wars at the same time.

This is like telling the Zetas, the Crips, the Aryan Brotherhood, the Gambinos, the Bloodz, the Mexican Mafia, and Hell’s Angels that we only have enough policemen to counter two of these gangs at one time!

Surely informed voters across this country will do the right thing and support a Republican candidate who understands the realities of our world situation.

Rick Santorum on Iran: “Iran will not get a nuclear weapon under my watch.”

 

Leave a Reply


Trackbacks

Other News

  • Christian Persecution Obama Admin: Fighting Terrorism but Supporting Terrorists?

    Obama Admin: Fighting Terrorism but Supporting Terrorists?

    News recently emerged that “the Obama administration is imposing sanctions on an Egypt-based group that has claimed responsibility for attacks against Egyptian officials, Israeli interests and foreign tourists in Cairo and the Sinai peninsula. The State Department said Wednesday [4/9/14] it has designated Ansar Bayt al-Muqadis a ‘foreign terrorist organization.’”

    While ostensibly a laudable move, some—many in Egypt—think this announcement is a ruse to portray the Obama administration as committed to combating terrorism, even as it supports the head of the terrorist-snake, the Muslim Brotherhood.

    For instance, according to Mustafa Zayid, the Coordinator of the Sufi Coalition Forces in Egypt,

    Read more →
  • Culture Christian Publisher Plans Pro-’Gay’ Book, Employees ‘Under Threat’

    Christian Publisher Plans Pro-’Gay’ Book, Employees ‘Under Threat’

    Is the Christian world about to suffer through another World Vision moment?

    The book’s author, Matthew Vines, is a homosexual activist and Bible revisionist known for manipulating Christian terminology to advance the counter-Christian homosexualist agenda.

    Despite his frequent use of a Christian-like lexicon, Vines surprisingly admits to running an apostate enterprise that he calls The Reformation Project. An unabashed denier of Biblical teaching on sexual morality, Vines has publicly acknowledged that his goal is to “reform church teaching on sexual orientation and gender identity.” The book is scheduled to be published on April 22, 2014.

    Read more →
  • Culture How The ‘Gay’ Jihad Normalized A Filthy Practice

    How The ‘Gay’ Jihad Normalized A Filthy Practice

    The public career beheading of former Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich at the hands of pagan sexual jihadists, coupled with an escalating epidemic of Christian business owners facing harsh government persecution for merely living out their faith, has startled awake an America lulled to sleep by the left’s intentionally deceptive, yet oh-so-sweet sounding serenade of “equality, tolerance and diversity.”

    Average folks have finally begun to recognize that America’s “progressive” power class of cultural Marxists and left-wing statists really intends, and always has, to subjugate ideological dissenters through abject inequality and intolerance, while demanding blind obedience to an anti-Christian, sexual-anarchist, socio-political agenda.

    Read more →
  • National Judge To Christians: Celebrate Gay Weddings Or Go To Jail

    Judge To Christians: Celebrate Gay Weddings Or Go To Jail

    An administrative judge has ruled Christians must now celebrate sodomy, or face jail.

    Spreading “civil rights commissions” in most cities and states are turning toward anti-Christian persecution, when Democrats and Judges rule that homosexual “rights” take precedence over Religious Freedom to opt out.

    Such was the case last week, when a pro-gay Judge in Colorado supported a pro-gay “rights” commission to enforce a Democrat non-discrimination law that openly punishes Christians.

    Jack Phillips, a Christian baker, was deemed to have no First Amendment protections, no right to protest, no free speech, no freedom of religion. Instead he was warned by Judge Robert N. Spencer that he must personally help celebrate homosexual “wedding” ceremonies or face $500 fines per future incident or jail.

    Read more →
  • National Why A Republican Governor Vetoed Religious Freedom

    Why A Republican Governor Vetoed Religious Freedom

    Before the Arizona Governor Jan Brewer (RINO-AZ) vetoed a religious freedom bill that would have protected Christian business owners, she was warned not to embrace the homosexual agenda by nearly a dozen law professors.

    “Nearly a dozen leading law professors from Harvard, Stanford, George Mason, Notre Dame and other top institutions across America have endorsed the controversial legislation in Arizona that would strengthen the state’s religious-rights standards,” reports WND.

    The bill has been egregiously misrepresented by many of its critics,” the professors said in a letter to Brewer. “We write because we believe that you should make your decision on the basis of accurate information.

    Read more →