What Conservative Media?

April 15, 2012 10:05 am 4 comments

Media bias has been a fact of political life for such a long time that many  conservatives can’t remember a time when the media wasn’t listing hard to port. At least we could, until quite recently, take solace that we had our own conservative media bastion, although it was nowhere near the size and the scope of the “lamestream media” (a term coined by Bernard Goldberg and made popular by Sarah Palin).

But at some point after the turn of the century, just as a majority of Americans began to visualize the true proportions of the larger media’s malpractice, our own little conservative press safe house had suffered a nasty termite infestation. Out of sight and out of mind behind the virtual walls of our conservative citadel of communications, hungry little pests were devouring the very foundation of that once proud citadel. There were signs that the framework was being eroded, but just a few on the right were paying enough attention to notice. Two yardsticks by which to measure just how deep into establishment Republican waters the erstwhile conservative press has drifted are Reagan conservatives Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin.

The first two-by-four to crumble was National Review. When founder William F. Buckley’s son Christopher endorsed Barrack Obama for president in 2008, that act of apparent treason to the conservative cause was largely viewed as an aberration, not a symptom of a problem which ran much deeper. It was not until 2011, after an NR editorial attacked Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry, that Rush Limbaugh observed that the publication had morphed from being the voice of conservatism into the voice of Republicanism, or to be more precise, the voice of Beltway Republicanism. And the new motto of the GOP establishment was unmistakable: “In Mitt Romney We Trust.” That message has been reinforced by numerous NRO articles and blog posts, with only occasional opposing views being published on the website and fewer still in the print version. National Review has criticized Sarah Palin in editorials, and contributors such as Mona Charen have lambasted the former Alaska Governor in columns and on NRO’s The Corner blog. Among the few contributors at NRO who have been generally fair to Palin and Gingrich are Andrew McCarthy and Robert Costa.

Another stud in the conservative media framework showed that it had been compromised in mid-December when The Washington Examiner not only endorsed Mitt Romney, but viciously went after Gingrich while doing so. The Examiner is owned by Denver billionaire Philip Anschutz, who contributed the maximum legal amount to Romney’s 2008 presidential run.

Emmett Tyrrell, Jr., founder and editor in chief of The American Spectator, has never shied away from expressing his disdain for Gingrich, dismissing the former Speaker of the House as “conservatism’s Bill Clinton, but without the charm.” Quin Hillyer, a senior Spectator editor, has railed against Gingrich and Sarah Palin. Stacy McCain, a Spectator contributor, has also attacked Gingrich while hopping from bandwagon to bandwagon among the GOP not-Romneys. Most of the Spectator’s writers finally settled on Rick Santorum as their candidate of choice, but now with the former Pennsylvania Senator out of the race and Gingrich the last conservative standing, find themselves in the curious position of having enabled Romney by default. To the credit of TAS, the publication did allow dissenting opinions to be expressed in favor of Gingrich by Jeffrey Lord and Peter Ferrara, but like some other outlets on the right, either willfully or unwittingly painted themselves into Romney’s corner.

Michelle Malken is a conservative pundit whose animosity for Gingrich borders on pure hatred. Though Hot Air is no longer operating under her ownership, most of HA’s contributors share her anti-Gingrich opinions. Allahpundit and Tina Korbe have been writing screeds very critical of Gingrich from day one. The remaining main page HA contributor, Ed Morrissey, was once fair to Gingrich, but has in recent months joined the chorus. Though Malkin has always defended Gov. Palin, Korbe and Allahpundit have been much less supportive.

Human Events has been more favorably disposed toward Gingrich and Palin. The former speaker still writes a column for what was Ronald Reagan’s favorite publication, and Gov. Palin was named the magazine’s Conservative of the Year in 2008. Ironically, the HE contributor who did the write-up for the ’08 award was Ann Coulter, once considered to be a conservative firebrand. Somewhere along the way, however, Coulter embraced moderates Mitt Romney and Chris Christie, and she turned the venom she used to reserve for hapless liberals on Gingrich and Palin. Of the two HE contributors who have been most positive about Gov. Palin, only John Hayward remains, as Tony Lee is no longer with the magazine.

Even RedState.com seems to have lost its way. Erick Erickson’s once well-respected website placed its bets on Rick Perry, but when the Texas governor dropped out of the race and threw his support to Gingrich, Erickson was not inclined to follow suit. The more influential RedStaters have for years judged all of Sarah Palins supporters by the rabid few, an unfortunate and unfair mistake. RS attacks on the Paliniste were so trenchant that the fallout which settled on the site has been nothing less than radioactive, and as a result, RS has deprived itself of page hits by the millions.

Of the relatively few major right-of-center sites which have remained supportive of Gov. Palin and at least fair to Speaker Gingrich, the Breitbart “Bigs” stand out. Though we mourn the passing of the Bigs’ namesake, Andrew Breitbart’s former colleagues are helping to keep Reagan conservatism alive. If only more so-called conservative news and opinion outlets shared their courage and determination. There is still hope, however, as the Bigs are a shining example of what advocacy journalism should be doing to advance the conservative cause.

As for the columnists the lamestream media they write for touts as “conservative” (and are anything but), most all of them treat Gingrich and Palin with equal contempt. We’re talking about a bunch here who devote at least twice as much of their column space attacking conservatives as they do criticizing the left, if they ever find themselves so disposed. Textbook examples here are Peggy Noonan, David Frum, Kathleen Parker, David Brooks and Jennifer Rubin, just to name a few. Among them, Noonan and Brooks are so far to the left that even Mitt Romney wasn’t “moderate” enough for them; they made no secret of their admiration for the one they also voted for: Barack Obama. There’s no shortage of vitriol from this group for Gingrich and Palin, but Jen Rubin is such a Romney sycophant that she has literally become a caricature of herself, even to the extent that a “Fake Jen Rubin” identity has become a popular joke among the Twitterati.

Even among “right wing” talk radio hosts, there are cracks in the conservative foundation. Hugh Hewett has long been a Romney booster, and Laura Ingraham has finally ended all pretense of being anywhere but in the tank for Romney. We got a preview of where her true feelings lie a few months back when, with Coulter on her show, she joined in with her guest in piling on Palin with non-stop ridicule of the first woman named to be a running mate on a Republican party presidential ticket. Glenn Beck has also stooped to ridicule Gov. Palin, and his criticism of Gingrich has been scathing. Michael Medved is another less-than-conservative voice on talk radio.

Judging by the shabby treatment of Palin and Gingrich by so many on the right, I’m prompted to ask, “What conservative media?” And why the rush by so many erstwhile conservatives to embrace a moderate for president? The argument given most often is “electablity,” but John Hawkins and Milton Wolf have provided plenty of evidence that Romney’s purported electablity is little more than a myth. Too many conservatives have either forgotten Ronald Reagan or have turned their backs on his principles. That’s a shame, because although Reagan’s time has passed, his principles are eternal. One of the principles espoused by the great president was to reject “pale pastels” and settle for nothing less than “bold colors” from the candidates we support and the issues we espouse. Those colors have become so watered down that it’s difficult to distinguish them in this day and age. And that doesn’t bode well for the future of the conservative cause.

- JP

4 Comments

  • You forgot to mention Rush and Levin.

    these are two bolworks that have not been compromised and have stayed true to their belief in the constitution and conservatism. G-d forbid we would loose these two

  • Thank God for the Patriot Statesman! I had given up all hope of finding a web site that actually espoused the truth about the “Quisling conservative” Republicans. Being a Tea Party follower,I’m even starting to suspect some of their members! I know its to late for this election cycle,but I sure wish a true conservative would start a party of our own. I’m sick of voting for “girlie men” like McLame or Dole and even the Bushes.I’m sure we could pick a candidate that would be better than any these phoney,establishment bed wetters have been able to give us.

  • Great article. I’m a conservative who is not voting this year.

  • The Republican Establishment and their wannabes outlined above know only one thing – HOW TO LOSE WELL. They are so taken by the LSM, the Washington and New York lifestyle that they take “the” only respectable positions. They have now taken up the unbelievable outline of “Game Change” that Palin is stupid. To dump on Palin with untruths and veiled sneers will lead only to defeat. Like it or not the woman base of the Party are Wal-Mart mothers not upper middle class club members. Male and Female backers of Palin are “working Americans”. Four years of sarcasm later the Party needs Palin. She has and will continue to do well on her own.

Leave a Reply


Other News

  • Christian Persecution World Russia Declares ‘Holy War’ On Islamic State

    Russia Declares ‘Holy War’ On Islamic State

    The Orthodox Christian Church, which is reclaiming its traditional role in post-Soviet Russia, has just described its government’s fight against the Islamic State and other jihadi groups in Syria as a “holy war.”

    According to Vsevolod Chaplin, head of the Church’s Public Affairs Department,

    The fight with terrorism is a holy battle and today our country is perhaps the most active force in the world fighting it. The Russian Federation has made a responsible decision on the use of armed forces to defend the People of Syria from the sorrows caused by the arbitrariness of terrorists. Christians are suffering in the region with the kidnapping of clerics and the destruction of churches. Muslims are suffering no less.

    This is not a pretext to justify intervention in Syria.

    Read more →
  • 2nd Amendment Faith Oregon Shooting – When Tragedy Happens Let’s Focus On The Cause And Not The Tools Used

    Oregon Shooting – When Tragedy Happens Let’s Focus On The Cause And Not The Tools Used

    While the blood was still dripping from those martyrs who, in front of an evil man armed with a gun, asked them if they were Christians and those strong in the faith said they were. He shot them in the head. While those who were lost or weak said nothing he spared their lives and shot them in their legs.

    Barrack Hussein Obama angrily ran to the cameras to use this opportunity to say that guns being in the hands of the law-abiding Americans is the problem, and we need to restrict the 2nd amendment to spare the lives of “we the people.”

    This is nuts; guns do not kill people, people kill people! You can test this fact in your own home right now. (Do not worry no one will get hurt).

    Read more →
  • 2nd Amendment Faith Gun Free Zones Are Killing Zones

    Gun Free Zones Are Killing Zones

    How did you feel when you heard of the shootings in Oregon this week? Was the first thing that came to your mind the thought that if we only had stricter gun control legislation, this kind of tragedy could have been prevented?

    If you listened to idiotic liberals, like President Barack “Insane” Obama, you might believe that. It is my contention that liberalism is a mental disorder based on the rejection of God and His principles, and extreme irresponsibility.

    Read more →
  • National Where’s the Beef, in Republican candidates, in 2015?

    Where’s the Beef, in Republican candidates, in 2015?

    What type of Republican Leader do you want in 2015?

    As we look at elections coming up quickly in 2015, as well as the very important 2016 election cycle, what type of “Republican” leaders do you want to shape the future of your county and country?

    Do you ever wonder why it is that the current crop of Republicans are not declaring, at every media interview, “These ills have been brought to you by the Democrat Party!” when speaking of Obamacare, the hordes of immigrants being allowed to destroy our country, the Iranian nuclear treaty, the “Black Lives Matter” racial division rhetoric, the attack on the defense of marriage, the 94 million Americans not currently in the work force,

    Read more →
  • National Child protection services Sentences Baby To Death ON 9/11/2015

    Child protection services Sentences Baby To Death ON 9/11/2015

    Child protection services should be self-explanatory based on the simplicity of its name. But they are doing exactly opposite of their name in many places. Wynne, Arkansas is one such place.

    A baby has been sentenced to death and will be executed on Friday, September 11, 2015 and Arkansas Department of HUMAN SERVICES (DHS) – Division of Children and Family Services- Central Office will facilitate the delivery of the baby’s 10-year-old to the abortion clinic.

    On August 29, 2015 20-year-old Justin Smith was arrested and charged with three counts of rape and one count of endangering the welfare of a minor. His “alleged” victim is a 10-year-old.

    Read more →