A Proposal To Determine If Barack Obama Is A Religious Icon

August 8, 2012 8:01 am 0 comments

Last month, I posted a discussing President Obama’s religion and offered several choices including two “hybrids”.  Check it out on this website if interested.

However, soon after President Obama’s inauguration, I wrote an article proposing to determine if Obama was a religious icon.  Recently, I revisited that article and found it as relevant and timely now as it was then.  So, without further ado, it follows.

A Proposal to Determine If Barack Obama Is a Religious Icon

Synopsis: Although most prominent in politics it appears Barack Obama – and millions of his supporters – consider him a religious icon as well as an historical president.  There is some confusion as to whether January 20, 2009 was an inauguration, coronation or ascension.  It’s timely to address this issue in the court of public opinion.  This proposal presents alternatives for thoughtful U.S. citizens to: consider iconic options; study each option; determine Obama’s status as a religious icon categorizing Him as a modern day:

1)    Messiah

2)    Prophet

3)    Saint

4)    Political Pope

5)    All of the above

6)    None of the above, i.e. a mortal politician.

Example of 6) Some skeptics divine no spiritual significance to Obama seeing him as a super slick, sophisticated, secular snake-oil salesman successfully selling selective socialism (of U.S. auto companies, financial institutions and health care) to replace Democrat-discredited free enterprise.

Methodology: This proposal states possibilities for the first four alternatives.  After reviewing those, readers can study, as necessary, the three major religions from which alternatives are derived.  Individuals should then be able to reach an informed decision about Obama’s status as a religious icon.  The three religions most involved:

  • Christianity including Catholics, Protestants and Mormons
  • Islam including significant “branches”
  • Judaism including significant “branches”

Each religion has certain qualifications for determining icon categories:

  • Messiah – Judaism is an accepted authority on Messiahs while Christianity is based on Jesus Christ as the true Messiah.
  • Prophet – Islamic and Jewish representatives are accepted authorities but Mormon beliefs might be relevant.  That church recognized 19th century prophets.
  • Saint and Pope – the Roman Catholic Church “wrote the book” on canons of sainthood and papal selection.

NB: Whereas an individual (or followers) can proclaim him/herself a Messiah or Prophet, more stringent requirements exist for Saints.

Possibilities for each status:


  • In his campaign Mr. Obama exhibited messianic traits convincing a majority of voters He is “The Chosen One”; “The One He was waiting for”.
    • He depicted himself as omniscient, i.e. possessing solutions to all economic and political problems.  With His supreme knowledge He is also nuanced, perceptive and wise.
    • He seemingly perceives the presidency and a congressional majority as rendering Him personally and politically omnipotent.
    • His media and memorabilia promoters have made Him omnipresent.
  • Old Testament scripture mentions “The weight of the government will be upon his shoulders….”
  • Catholics believe the mother of Mary (mother of Jesus) was without original sin. Obama’s grandmother must have been without political sin for Obama to emerge from corrupt Chicago and Illinois politics unblemished and unstained.
  • If Obama is determined to be a modern day Messiah:
    • A new book might be added to the Holy Bible: “The Gospel of Barack”.
    • The Holy Trinity might become “The Gospel Quartet”, “Father, Son, Holy Spirit and Obama”!
    • The website (www.barackknows) can continue enabling devotees to go online 24/7 for answers to “What would Barack do?”
    • The presidential cabinet could be reduced in number to 12 and renamed “The 12 Apostles” although the Treasury Secretary shouldn’t be rechristened “Judas”.


  • In his campaign Mr. Obama prophesied — channeling Jeremiah by lamenting the terrible events to befall the nation if a Republican were elected president.
    • Since a Republican wasn’t elected, it’s impossible to determine the accuracy of Obama’s prophetic lamentations.
    • Should, Heaven forbid, those terrible events occur “on Obama’s watch” –although he might consider them “beyond his pay grade” — it would seem to negate his candidacy as a legitimate prophet.
  • Prophetic statements abound promising the bountiful blessings to be bestowed upon the nation by electing Barack president and giving him majorities in both houses of Congress.
  • Until those bountiful blessings are bestowed, it may not be possible to determine Barack’s status as prophet.
  • However, if determined to be a modern-day prophet, a new book might be added to the Old Testament: “The Book of Obama”:
    • It could include his non-messianic speeches and writings.
    • If those are too scant, the book could also include (without crediting Kahil Gibran) any portions of Mr. Gibran’s book “The Prophet” that could burnish Mr. Obama’s status as a prophet.


Ironically, sainthood may be the most difficult to achieve due to certain specific requirements.

  • The title of “saint” means a “candidate” lived a holy life, is in Heaven and is recognized by the catholic (small “c”) church.
    • Sadly, “community organizers” aren’t automatically holy “saints”.
    • Canonization started in the early church with all the Apostles called saints.
    • The other first saints were martyrs who sacrificed their lives for their faith.
    • The Roman Catholic Church became involved many years later:
      • The title of Saint is applied after a candidate’s death.                         (Isn’t the devil always in the details?)
      • In addition to an exemplary life, a candidate must have performed one miracle before his or her death.
      • Exception: martyrs are not required to have performed a miracle while alive but must have done so after death (as proof she or he is in Heaven and capable of intercession on earth).

Pope (Political)

Internet definition: “Papal Infallibility” means the Pope is infallible when proclaiming, as a definitive act, some doctrine of faith and morals.  It doesn’t extend to all his actions and statements.

President Obama seemingly considers himself infallible in all his political proclamations.  If he doesn’t convince a requisite majority with one speech, he will deliver additional speeches ad infinitum and ex cathedra until an issue is decided in his favor or a majority vote goes to the opposition.

Final Discussion

Although there is no official “Political Pope” readers are free to confer this title on Obama if they consider it justified.

On the other hand, unless readers ignore clear-cut requirements for sainthood, they might logically decide — since Barack is alive and not in Heaven – he can’t classify as a saint.  If so decided, readers should then return to and address the remaining possibilities including Political Pope or mortal politician.

Other News

  • Christian Persecution World Russia Declares ‘Holy War’ On Islamic State

    Russia Declares ‘Holy War’ On Islamic State

    The Orthodox Christian Church, which is reclaiming its traditional role in post-Soviet Russia, has just described its government’s fight against the Islamic State and other jihadi groups in Syria as a “holy war.”

    According to Vsevolod Chaplin, head of the Church’s Public Affairs Department,

    The fight with terrorism is a holy battle and today our country is perhaps the most active force in the world fighting it. The Russian Federation has made a responsible decision on the use of armed forces to defend the People of Syria from the sorrows caused by the arbitrariness of terrorists. Christians are suffering in the region with the kidnapping of clerics and the destruction of churches. Muslims are suffering no less.

    This is not a pretext to justify intervention in Syria.

    Read more →
  • 2nd Amendment Faith Oregon Shooting – When Tragedy Happens Let’s Focus On The Cause And Not The Tools Used

    Oregon Shooting – When Tragedy Happens Let’s Focus On The Cause And Not The Tools Used

    While the blood was still dripping from those martyrs who, in front of an evil man armed with a gun, asked them if they were Christians and those strong in the faith said they were. He shot them in the head. While those who were lost or weak said nothing he spared their lives and shot them in their legs.

    Barrack Hussein Obama angrily ran to the cameras to use this opportunity to say that guns being in the hands of the law-abiding Americans is the problem, and we need to restrict the 2nd amendment to spare the lives of “we the people.”

    This is nuts; guns do not kill people, people kill people! You can test this fact in your own home right now. (Do not worry no one will get hurt).

    Read more →
  • 2nd Amendment Faith Gun Free Zones Are Killing Zones

    Gun Free Zones Are Killing Zones

    How did you feel when you heard of the shootings in Oregon this week? Was the first thing that came to your mind the thought that if we only had stricter gun control legislation, this kind of tragedy could have been prevented?

    If you listened to idiotic liberals, like President Barack “Insane” Obama, you might believe that. It is my contention that liberalism is a mental disorder based on the rejection of God and His principles, and extreme irresponsibility.

    Read more →
  • National Where’s the Beef, in Republican candidates, in 2015?

    Where’s the Beef, in Republican candidates, in 2015?

    What type of Republican Leader do you want in 2015?

    As we look at elections coming up quickly in 2015, as well as the very important 2016 election cycle, what type of “Republican” leaders do you want to shape the future of your county and country?

    Do you ever wonder why it is that the current crop of Republicans are not declaring, at every media interview, “These ills have been brought to you by the Democrat Party!” when speaking of Obamacare, the hordes of immigrants being allowed to destroy our country, the Iranian nuclear treaty, the “Black Lives Matter” racial division rhetoric, the attack on the defense of marriage, the 94 million Americans not currently in the work force,

    Read more →
  • National Child protection services Sentences Baby To Death ON 9/11/2015

    Child protection services Sentences Baby To Death ON 9/11/2015

    Child protection services should be self-explanatory based on the simplicity of its name. But they are doing exactly opposite of their name in many places. Wynne, Arkansas is one such place.

    A baby has been sentenced to death and will be executed on Friday, September 11, 2015 and Arkansas Department of HUMAN SERVICES (DHS) – Division of Children and Family Services- Central Office will facilitate the delivery of the baby’s 10-year-old to the abortion clinic.

    On August 29, 2015 20-year-old Justin Smith was arrested and charged with three counts of rape and one count of endangering the welfare of a minor. His “alleged” victim is a 10-year-old.

    Read more →